<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iterability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://keywords.oxus.net/archives/2004/10/10/iterability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://keywords.oxus.net/archives/2004/10/10/iterability/</link>
	<description>The personal blog of P. Kerim Friedman.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 02:00:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sokal Hoax, Friedrich Nietzsche, Attacks on Deconstruction, and More Bad Writing &#171; biblioklept</title>
		<link>http://keywords.oxus.net/archives/2004/10/10/iterability/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sokal Hoax, Friedrich Nietzsche, Attacks on Deconstruction, and More Bad Writing &#171; biblioklept</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keywords.oxus.net/?p=1923#comment-660</guid>
		<description>[...] Okay. Now. So. Is Sokal right? Is there a tendency in humanities departments toward obscurantism with elitist undertones? Absolutely. However, I see this as the academic byproduct of the writers under attack, the detritus of myriad misunderstandings and misreadings. Nobody&#8217;s perfect, obviously. I disagree that certain of the writers Sokal attacks&#8211;Julia Kristeva in particular (a hero of mine, whose writing I find to be both wonderfully lucid and poetically profound)&#8211;are purposefully difficult. Most of the deconstructionists mentioned above take their lead from Nietzsche, and thus employ a strange, elliptical, roundabout and often poetic strategy to their writing. The deconstructionist methodology itself is an affront to easy readings&#8211;simply put, it&#8217;s meant to make you think. Furthermore, philosophy, for most of us, is not beach reading. Interestingly, and perhaps ironically, Sokal&#8217;s gesture is an essentially postmodern move, a deconstructive move&#8211;a challenge to the new establishment of academic humanities and cultural studies. Even his use of recontextualized quotes is an affirmation of Derrida&#8217;s concept of iterability. The greatest value of the hoax is that it reinforces the tenets of deconstruction: to upset the places we feel are comfortable and safe, prompting constant re-examination of our aims and goals. Sokal&#8217;s hoax initiates a dynamic rethinking of the way we write and the way we read. Who are we writing for? How are we presenting our ideas? Do we understand what we are saying? More than anything, Sokal&#8217;s hoax calls attention to the constant need for peer review, for academia to question itself, its products, its institutions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Okay. Now. So. Is Sokal right? Is there a tendency in humanities departments toward obscurantism with elitist undertones? Absolutely. However, I see this as the academic byproduct of the writers under attack, the detritus of myriad misunderstandings and misreadings. Nobody&#8217;s perfect, obviously. I disagree that certain of the writers Sokal attacks&#8211;Julia Kristeva in particular (a hero of mine, whose writing I find to be both wonderfully lucid and poetically profound)&#8211;are purposefully difficult. Most of the deconstructionists mentioned above take their lead from Nietzsche, and thus employ a strange, elliptical, roundabout and often poetic strategy to their writing. The deconstructionist methodology itself is an affront to easy readings&#8211;simply put, it&#8217;s meant to make you think. Furthermore, philosophy, for most of us, is not beach reading. Interestingly, and perhaps ironically, Sokal&#8217;s gesture is an essentially postmodern move, a deconstructive move&#8211;a challenge to the new establishment of academic humanities and cultural studies. Even his use of recontextualized quotes is an affirmation of Derrida&#8217;s concept of iterability. The greatest value of the hoax is that it reinforces the tenets of deconstruction: to upset the places we feel are comfortable and safe, prompting constant re-examination of our aims and goals. Sokal&#8217;s hoax initiates a dynamic rethinking of the way we write and the way we read. Who are we writing for? How are we presenting our ideas? Do we understand what we are saying? More than anything, Sokal&#8217;s hoax calls attention to the constant need for peer review, for academia to question itself, its products, its institutions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Savage Minds: Notes and Queries in Anthropology — A Group Blog &#187; Verbal Privilege</title>
		<link>http://keywords.oxus.net/archives/2004/10/10/iterability/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Savage Minds: Notes and Queries in Anthropology — A Group Blog &#187; Verbal Privilege</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keywords.oxus.net/?p=1923#comment-659</guid>
		<description>[...] I can&#8217;t think of a much better way to explain why anthropologists should read Derrida, without making everyone feel all iterable.    &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I can&#8217;t think of a much better way to explain why anthropologists should read Derrida, without making everyone feel all iterable.    &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iterability: Web Search Results from Answers.com</title>
		<link>http://keywords.oxus.net/archives/2004/10/10/iterability/comment-page-1/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>iterability: Web Search Results from Answers.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keywords.oxus.net/?p=1923#comment-658</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] InitForm(&#039;lookup1&#039;,&#039;autodiv1&#039;,&#039;down&#039;);   showHide_TellMeAbout2(false);       &#160;&#160; Business &#160; &#160; Entertainment &#160; &#160; Food &#160; &#160; Games &#160; &#160; Health &#160; &#160; People &#160; &#160; Places &#160; &#160; Reference &#160; &#160; Science &#160; &#160; Shopping &#160; &#160; Words &#160; &#160; More...    BodyLoad(&#039;/main&#039;, &#039;startswith&#039;,&#039;s&#039;);  Spell CheckDid You Mean: alterability alterable  adoral operable  wearability durability  durability (computer science) adorable  arable durable   Mentioned In iterability is mentioned in the following topics: Judith ButlerWeb Search  Results 1 - 10 of about 1,130 for&#160;iterability. &#160;IterabilityDerrida speaks of &quot;iterability&quot; throughout his works. We are accustomed to hearing people say, &quot;could you reiterate that?&quot; -- ordinarily, in other words, ...www.units.muohio.edu/technologyandhumanities/ eng495/iterability.htmKeywords » IterabilityIterability. Derrida (1930-2004) famously argued that writing preceded speech. By this I believe he meant that the “iterability” of language logically ...keywords.oxus.net/archives/2004/10/10/iterability/ReadingIterability. Repeatability and differentiality combined. Derrida’s early work established a number of what we might call principles. ...courses.nus.edu.sg/course/elljwp/repetition.htmLemma 17: Presence and AbsenceThe absence of writing is represented by the iterability that writing is. ... Iterability would seem to be something of a divine name. ...courses.nus.edu.sg/course/elljwp/Lemmas17&amp;18.htm[Python-Dev] Single- vs. Multi-pass iterabilityMulti-pass iterability. Barry A. Warsaw barry@zope.com Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:30:51 -0400. Previous message: [Python-Dev] Single- vs. Multi-pass iterability ...mail.python.org/pipermail/ python-dev/2002-July/026618.html[Python-Dev] Re: Single- vs. Multi-pass iterabilityMulti-pass iterability. François Pinard pinard@iro.umontreal.ca 04 Aug 2002 21:34:26 -0400. Previous message: [Python-Dev] Single- vs. ...mail.python.org/pipermail/ python-dev/2002-August/027321.htmlVirginia Woolf: Translation and ‘Iterability’‘iterability’ that allow the Greek text to pose new questions. ... Near the end of her life Woolf showed that a world bereft of iterability su·ers ...www.ingentaconnect.com/content/mhra/ yes/2006/00000036/00000001/art00013IngentaConnect Iterability and the Order-Word Plateau: A Politics ...It begins by juxtaposing Derrida&#039;s concept/nonconcept of &#039;iterability&#039; to ... The paper then concludes by drawing a tentative link between iterability and ...www.ingentaconnect.com/content/brill/ crh/2003/00000004/00000002/art00005Iterability of ZeroIt is the iterability of signs and marks which makes them a mark or a sign. ... Zero is not an event of iterability. Iterability of a sign doesn&#039;t mean that ...www.thinkartlab.com/pkl/media/ DERRIDA/Iterability%20of%20Zero.htmlIterability of Type 1 Premiceto prove the iterability of those type 1 premice carrying a. special kind of extenders, ... conditions are iterability of the respected objects and ...www.cirm.univ-mrs.fr/web.ang/ videos/2004/040928/28_Feng.pdfResult Page:&#160;&#160;&#160;1&#160;&#160;&#160;2&#160;&#160;&#160;3&#160;&#160;&#160;4&#160;&#160;&#160;5&#160;&#160;&#160;6&#160;&#160;&#160;7&#160;&#160;&#160;8&#160;&#160;&#160;9&#160;&#160;&#160;10&#160;&#160;&#160;Next [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] InitForm(&#8216;lookup1&#8242;,&#8217;autodiv1&#8242;,&#8217;down&#8217;);   showHide_TellMeAbout2(false);       &nbsp;&nbsp; Business &nbsp; &nbsp; Entertainment &nbsp; &nbsp; Food &nbsp; &nbsp; Games &nbsp; &nbsp; Health &nbsp; &nbsp; People &nbsp; &nbsp; Places &nbsp; &nbsp; Reference &nbsp; &nbsp; Science &nbsp; &nbsp; Shopping &nbsp; &nbsp; Words &nbsp; &nbsp; More&#8230;    BodyLoad(&#8216;/main&#8217;, &#8216;startswith&#8217;,'s&#8217;);  Spell CheckDid You Mean: alterability alterable  adoral operable  wearability durability  durability (computer science) adorable  arable durable   Mentioned In iterability is mentioned in the following topics: Judith ButlerWeb Search  Results 1 &#8211; 10 of about 1,130 for&nbsp;iterability. &nbsp;IterabilityDerrida speaks of &quot;iterability&quot; throughout his works. We are accustomed to hearing people say, &quot;could you reiterate that?&quot; &#8212; ordinarily, in other words, &#8230;www.units.muohio.edu/technologyandhumanities/ eng495/iterability.htmKeywords » IterabilityIterability. Derrida (1930-2004) famously argued that writing preceded speech. By this I believe he meant that the “iterability” of language logically &#8230;keywords.oxus.net/archives/2004/10/10/iterability/ReadingIterability. Repeatability and differentiality combined. Derrida’s early work established a number of what we might call principles. &#8230;courses.nus.edu.sg/course/elljwp/repetition.htmLemma 17: Presence and AbsenceThe absence of writing is represented by the iterability that writing is. &#8230; Iterability would seem to be something of a divine name. &#8230;courses.nus.edu.sg/course/elljwp/Lemmas17&amp;18.htm[Python-Dev] Single- vs. Multi-pass iterabilityMulti-pass iterability. Barry A. Warsaw <a href="mailto:barry@zope.com">barry@zope.com</a> Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:30:51 -0400. Previous message: [Python-Dev] Single- vs. Multi-pass iterability &#8230;mail.python.org/pipermail/ python-dev/2002-July/026618.html[Python-Dev] Re: Single- vs. Multi-pass iterabilityMulti-pass iterability. François Pinard <a href="mailto:pinard@iro.umontreal.ca">pinard@iro.umontreal.ca</a> 04 Aug 2002 21:34:26 -0400. Previous message: [Python-Dev] Single- vs. &#8230;mail.python.org/pipermail/ python-dev/2002-August/027321.htmlVirginia Woolf: Translation and ‘Iterability’‘iterability’ that allow the Greek text to pose new questions. &#8230; Near the end of her life Woolf showed that a world bereft of iterability su·ers &#8230;www.ingentaconnect.com/content/mhra/ yes/2006/00000036/00000001/art00013IngentaConnect Iterability and the Order-Word Plateau: A Politics &#8230;It begins by juxtaposing Derrida&#39;s concept/nonconcept of &#39;iterability&#39; to &#8230; The paper then concludes by drawing a tentative link between iterability and &#8230;www.ingentaconnect.com/content/brill/ crh/2003/00000004/00000002/art00005Iterability of ZeroIt is the iterability of signs and marks which makes them a mark or a sign. &#8230; Zero is not an event of iterability. Iterability of a sign doesn&#39;t mean that &#8230;www.thinkartlab.com/pkl/media/ DERRIDA/Iterability%20of%20Zero.htmlIterability of Type 1 Premiceto prove the iterability of those type 1 premice carrying a. special kind of extenders, &#8230; conditions are iterability of the respected objects and &#8230;www.cirm.univ-mrs.fr/web.ang/ videos/2004/040928/28_Feng.pdfResult Page:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;5&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;6&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;7&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;9&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;10&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Savage Minds: Notes and Queries in Anthropology — A Group Blog</title>
		<link>http://keywords.oxus.net/archives/2004/10/10/iterability/comment-page-1/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>Savage Minds: Notes and Queries in Anthropology — A Group Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keywords.oxus.net/?p=1923#comment-657</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;   What seems to bother Tribble here is not so much the comments themselves (after all, one would think an academic would have a bit more worry about inane comments made in the classroom!), but their iterability  —their capacity to be repeated and, in being repeated, to escape the control of their author. The appropriate public venue for academic speech is publication, after passing through layers of vetting and peer review to minimize the consequences of&lt;!--%kramer-post--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->   What seems to bother Tribble here is not so much the comments themselves (after all, one would think an academic would have a bit more worry about inane comments made in the classroom!), but their iterability  —their capacity to be repeated and, in being repeated, to escape the control of their author. The appropriate public venue for academic speech is publication, after passing through layers of vetting and peer review to minimize the consequences of<!--%kramer-post--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

