<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back in Print</title>
	<atom:link href="http://keywords.oxus.net/archives/2005/04/13/back-in-print/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://keywords.oxus.net/archives/2005/04/13/back-in-print/</link>
	<description>The personal blog of P. Kerim Friedman.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 02:00:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Liberman</title>
		<link>http://keywords.oxus.net/archives/2005/04/13/back-in-print/comment-page-1/#comment-1597</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Liberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keywords.oxus.net/?p=2141#comment-1597</guid>
		<description>A properly managed scanning operation (like Google Print&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://print.google.com/googleprint/library.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;library initiative&lt;/a&gt;) imposes relatively little cost per work scanned.



The discussion on the Google Weblog

&lt;a href=&quot;http://google.blogspace.com/archives/001493&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;estimates&lt;/a&gt; a cost of $10/book, which is reasonable given my limited experience with such efforts.



I notice that the re-issued classics that you cite more than twice this amount per copy.



So there might be valid reasons not to re-issue such classics in digital form under some sort of Creative Commons license, but &quot;prohibitive&quot; cost is surely not one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A properly managed scanning operation (like Google Print&#8217;s <a href="http://print.google.com/googleprint/library.html" rel="nofollow">library initiative</a>) imposes relatively little cost per work scanned.</p>
<p>The discussion on the Google Weblog</p>
<p><a href="http://google.blogspace.com/archives/001493" rel="nofollow">estimates</a> a cost of $10/book, which is reasonable given my limited experience with such efforts.</p>
<p>I notice that the re-issued classics that you cite more than twice this amount per copy.</p>
<p>So there might be valid reasons not to re-issue such classics in digital form under some sort of Creative Commons license, but &#8220;prohibitive&#8221; cost is surely not one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

