<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Bollywood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://keywords.oxus.net/archives/2005/10/30/digital-bollywood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://keywords.oxus.net/archives/2005/10/30/digital-bollywood/</link>
	<description>The personal blog of P. Kerim Friedman.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 02:00:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bollywood Rumors: Bollywood Archives</title>
		<link>http://keywords.oxus.net/archives/2005/10/30/digital-bollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-2476</link>
		<dc:creator>Bollywood Rumors: Bollywood Archives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keywords.oxus.net/?p=2334#comment-2476</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Digital Bollywood &#013;&#010;&#013;&#010;[Keywords] In the United States, a digital roll-out has stalled while Hollywood studios and theater owners fight over who pays for top-quality computer-based projection systems that cost $80,000 to $100,000 per screen. But in the Mumbai-based film industry known as Bollywood, entrepreneurs are willing to settle for a bit less quality at one-third the cost. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Digital Bollywood &#13;&#10;&#13;&#10;[Keywords] In the United States, a digital roll-out has stalled while Hollywood studios and theater owners fight over who pays for top-quality computer-based projection systems that cost $80,000 to $100,000 per screen. But in the Mumbai-based film industry known as Bollywood, entrepreneurs are willing to settle for a bit less quality at one-third the cost. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

